I did an MBTI personality test a little while ago, and it has been quite amusing to look at the results. It sorts you into one of two types in four different categories, so you end up with four letters representing how you fit into each category. Don't get too hung up on the names, the words don't mean exactly what you would use them to mean and it is a gradual scale where people will inevitably have elements of both so, for example, someone who prefers 'thinking' isn't a cold, unfeeling bastard.
The categories are extrovert or introvert - referring to whether you like to verbalise exactly what's going on in your head and make decisions by talking it through (E) or like to stay quiet until you really know what you're talking about, and make decisions by thinking for yourself (I).
Then there is sensing or intuition - if you like concrete information, facts and statistics and are keen on remembering details you're an S, whereas if you prefer to think about more abstract theoretical concepts and look at the bigger picture you're an N (as I is already taken).
Next is thinking or feeling - if you're a T you will prefer to think about things in a logical, sensible manner and value fairness, if you're an F you will be more interested in making sure everyone is happy and value compassion.
Finally there is judging or perception - the difference being whether you prefer to be organised and plan work and play ahead of time (J) or you prefer spontaneity and doing things at the last minute so you don't miss anything which may come up unexpectedly (P).
I am, apparently, an INTJ (feel free to scroll up and see if you agree) which makes me part of the least common personality type - particularly in women, where only 1% are INTJ's. But what I was more interested in when doing this, was what careers it might show to suit me. Interestingly, this personality type is the most common type found in academia (isn't it ironic it took me a couple of attempts to spell that), so apparently I am doomed to be a philosopher after all. I'd better start concentrating to pick up some tips on how not to lecture. Unfortunately, it would seem nearly all the careers which would suit me sound... like not my kind of thing. I would apparently suit being an engineer, lots of different types of scientist, military leader (yeah, exactly), entrepreneur, banker or, hilariously, a computer programmer. It would seem the most appealing of all those means that me and Andrew really are the same person. Either that or I just give up on my convictions and become a teacher. Well, we women do all turn into our mothers...
On a brighter note (not that I consider being like my mother a 'dark' thing), apparently being an INTJ makes me least likely to suffer heart disease, and among the types with the highest income. Also, there's a whole bunch of us in hell - we're the least likely of all types to believe in a higher spiritual power. Seems quite fitting.
Some famous INTJ's? Stephen Hawking, John Maynard Keynes, Sir Isaac Newton and Lewis Carroll. Not too shabby really.
I would recommend doing the test for yourself, as it is very interesting to learn how you work most effectively, but unfortunately the real thing costs money. Unless your uni provides it free, of course (: Otherwise, you can probably get a vague idea of what you might be from my ramblings above. But the real reason to do it? It can be great fun to work out what types other people you know might be. So take a look.
Monday, 7 March 2011
The shoe that fits one person pinches another; there is no recipe for living that suits all cases
Posted by KatyDots at 12:18 0 comments
Labels: famous people, jobs, MBTI, personality types, really boring post
Saturday, 5 February 2011
People are just as happy as they make up their minds to be
Today I learned that doing one small thing can make a big difference.
Posted by KatyDots at 15:05 0 comments
Labels: Argentine tango, reflecting, stuff that's not interesting
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
Photographs force us to see people before their future weighed them down
It's strange what a photograph can do.
Posted by KatyDots at 13:18 1 comments
Labels: happy memories, photographs, things I can't do much about
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
I keep turning over new leaves, and spoiling them, as I used to spoil my copybooks; and I make so many beginnings there never will be an end.
So I'm writing again.
Posted by KatyDots at 13:49 0 comments
Labels: hello again, rules I will forget and break
Monday, 1 March 2010
The end of a melody is not its goal: but nonetheless, had the melody not reached its end it would not have reached its goal either
No one is indestructible. Pity really. But we all so dearly love to think that we are.
Posted by KatyDots at 08:47 0 comments
Labels: au revoir, destructible, unplanned pregnancy
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
Luke: Is the dark side stronger? Yoda: No.... Quicker, easier, more seductive.
Posted by KatyDots at 13:09 0 comments
Labels: ability to breath, darkness, hollister (ergh), queuing, self-importance
Saturday, 23 January 2010
A product favored mainly by children and serves as a prevalent spread on their sandwiches
So our kitchen is largely complete. Before Christmas my parents decided we needed a new one, which means it has been a mad rush to get it all sorted before the VAT increase. This further means we currently have no tiles on the walls, and paint work and flooring that doesn't go with the cupboards. What an excellently planned endeavour.
Posted by KatyDots at 04:04 0 comments
